|
First Chapter of the Book |
|||||||
|
This is the first chapter of the book, from pages 11 to 42. The entire book is 387 pages. The rest of the book explores many more passages of Scripture, and offers a lot of additional Scriptural evidence for the New Wine System. If you find this chapter interesting, you will want to order and read the entire book. Also, please tell others about New Wine for the End Times.
The New Wine System in a Nutshell Traditional conservative mainstream Christian teaching says that if you die without having made a profession of faith in Jesus Christ, that you will spend eternity in hell. For many people, this teaching brings up a series of difficult questions. What about the people who have died without hearing about Jesus? Will they spend eternity in hell? I agree with all the theologians who say we need Christ Jesus to be saved. But few have offered a good solution to this very puzzling dilemma. What about infants who die? Will they spend eternity in hell? Many Catholics believe in a place called limbo, for infants who have not been baptized, which is neither heaven nor hell. This is a long-standing Catholic tradition. But Protestants want Scriptural evidence for all doctrines. Infants are born with Adam’s sinful state (Rom. 5:12-21, 1 Cor. 15:22). All parents know that their infant child will rebel and be disobedient at some point as they begin to grow. So it becomes a dilemma for theologians. How can infants go to heaven given Adam’s sinful state? The doctrine of infant baptism was developed early in church history, to allow for the salvation of infants. Many believe that infant baptism removes Adam’s sinful state. Yet there is no Scripture to directly support this claim. Most believe that a merciful God will not condemn infants to hell. But they offer very little Scriptural evidence. If God is merciful to infants, then He also will be merciful to young children. Right? Is there some age of accountability that a child reaches, which immediately condemns him or her to hell if the child should die without Christ after that age? What if the child misses this age by a day or two? Can young children go to heaven without having overcome Adam’s sinful state? Even young children have already sinned. These are very difficult questions for theologians. Will the mentally ill be condemned to hell? If not, where does God draw the line? How mentally ill does one have to be in order to get an exemption? If God allows the mentally ill to go to heaven without a profession of faith in Christ, then what does that do to the verse that says no man comes to the Father except through Christ? Some people go to the doctrines of election to answer these questions. The argument is that all infants who die are automatically elected. Spurgeon believed that only those who are elected for salvation are allowed to die in infancy. Perhaps all people with mental illness are also elected and thus saved. Other people argue that infants are not held responsible for Adam’s sin, and they have no sins of their own. What about infants who died in ancient times, in areas of the world that would not hear about Christ for centuries to come? Under the argument of election, does this mean that God simply arranges for all his elect to die when they are infants, in order that they can be saved? Does this really sound like God’s plan for his chosen? What about young children? Children sin before they can understand about Christ. Are children who die young automatically non-elect, even if their parents are saved? Also, many people find the doctrines of election difficult to believe of a merciful God. Does God really choose a predestination of hell for people before they are born? Does God condemn people who die without hearing about Christ? If not, then what about people who have heard, but the missionary did a poor job of telling about Christ? Does God take into account Satan’s deceptions? What if the missionary failed to identify a cultural barrier that causes the person not to understand? Could the missionary’s failed attempt at witness actually cause the person to lose his salvation? In this book, I hope to show that the many millions of pagans of the ancient world, and the many millions of Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, New Agers, Christians, and Jews of the modern world, who have died in their sins, will have the opportunity to be saved by the blood of Jesus Christ during the millennium. Infants and children who die young will mature in Christ during the millennium. People who are mentally ill and cannot understand anything about Christ will mature in Christ during the millennium. And people who have heard about Christ, but get killed in automobile accidents, before making that decision, will be able to mature in Christ during the millennium. This is the Mystery of God: Christ really did come to save the world in a much more glorious way than has ever been understood. Thus, the glory of Christ, and the glory of His salvation, is far greater than anyone has ever imagined. All this will be shown in Scripture simply by reading it the way ancient Jews would have done. A Quick Introduction to the New Wine System Part One of the book presents these claims without going deeply into the Scriptural evidence. The purpose of this chapter is to get an understanding of these claims before delving into all the supporting arguments. Also, we will look at all the problems that are solved with this New Wine System, as described in this book. Some Scripture will be presented in this chapter to get us going. But most of the Scriptural evidence is in the chapters that follow. However, it’s also a good idea to first get a ‘nutshell’ overview of the New Wine System, and to take an initial glimpse of some Scripture in support of this system. The New Wine System is based on three types of people in the grave. This book presents many arguments of Scripture to support this system. But for right now, let’s just take a look at an outline and a chart which describes the New Wine System. Then we will briefly look at three verses of Scripture for evidence in support of this system.
|
(Second Edition)
| ||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
In support of this outline and chart, consider the following three points of Scripture: (1) Scripture teaches that at the Great White Throne of Judgment, everyone who is not in the Book of Life is condemned to the lake of fire (Rev. 20:15). Scripture also teaches that the resurrection is a thousand years prior (Rev. 20:4). (2) Scripture teaches that “many,” but not all, of the unjust are resurrected right after the great tribulation (Dan. 12:1-3, John 5:25,28-29.) Both the just and the unjust are resurrected at the same time. For those who would say that a thousand years is inserted between the resurrection of the just and the unjust, John 5:28 says, "For an hour is coming when all those who are in the tombs will hear his voice." Also, the timing of Dan 12:1-3 is explicitly tied to the great tribulation. (3) Daniel 12:1-3 teaches that even the resurrected unjust are in the Book of Life, at that time. They are "delivered" or "escape" from the grave simply because their names are in the Book of Life. Since the resurrected unjust are in the Book of Life, they certainly have an opportunity for salvation. As long as their names are still in the Book of Life at the end of the millennium, they will be saved.
The Hebrew word used for “delivered” is better translated as “escape.” Some will argue that Daniel 12:1 says those who are “delivered” or “escape” are being delivered from the great tribulation. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates like to interpret it this way. However, Scripture teaches that the saints are defeated during the great tribulation (Dan. 7:25, Rev. 13:5-7). These saints are also in the Book of Life. Therefore, Daniel 12:1 cannot be saying that those in the Book of Life are all delivered from the great tribulation. Those in the Book of Life are “delivered” or “escape” from the grave. According to the verse, some who escape the grave are raised to everlasting life. Others who escape the grave are raised to shame and contempt. But not all who are in the grave escape. According to the verse, “many” awake, but not all. What then, is the criterion given for being raised? Apparently, it’s not an issue of being just or unjust. Those who are in the Book of Life are the ones who escape from the grave.
Jesus said “my sheep hear my voice” (John 10:27). But many of Christ’s sheep are still lost (Mat. 10:6, 15:24, Luke 15:4-6). It’s only the people who hear Christ’s voice from the grave that are raised, according to John 5:25. However, according to verses 28 and 29, those who hear Christ’s voice include both those who have done good, and those who have done evil. The word “all” in this verse is qualified by verse 25. It’s only those who hear who will live. And it’s only Christ’s sheep who hear his voice.
For those who say that the unjust are not raised until after the millennium, I would point out that each of these verses say all this happens at an “hour” that is to come. We should not stretch this hour into a millennium. And it’s not two different hours separated by a millennium. The unjust, who hear Christ’s voice, are raised at the start of the millennium along with the righteous. They then have the opportunity to accept Christ and to mature in Christ during that time. The righteous, on the other hand, will reign as kings and priests with Christ during the millennium (Rev. 1:6, 2:26-27, 5:10, 20:6). But what about the fact that “all” who are in the tombs will hear Christ’s voice and come out? How does this reconcile with what Christ said just three verses earlier, that “those who hear will live?” How is it that only those who hear will live, and yet all who are in the tombs will hear and come out? Are all the dead in literal tombs? Or is tombs simply a metaphor? Could it be that being in a tomb is a metaphor for those awaiting the resurrection? Could it be that those who do not hear Christ’s voice are not metaphorically in their tombs? To be buried in a tomb generally meant that you were wealthy. The poor were cremated. This is not to say that only the wealthy will be resurrected. However, the belief in the resurrection was certainly a strong reason that people who could afford it, chose to be buried in tombs. The Greek word for “grave” is Hades. Many (but not all) in the “dust of the earth” will awake. I believe that it’s significant that Jesus uses the word “tomb” here instead of simply saying Hades. Everyone in the metaphorical “tomb” will hear Christ’s voice because they await resurrection. But not everyone in the “grave” will be resurrected. Putting it all Together If we interpret John 5:25-29 in light of Daniel 12:1-3, then it all comes together. Not everyone is raised. Only those in the Book of Life are raised. These are Christ’s sheep. The Book of Life is simply a list of all Christ’s sheep. But some of Christ’s sheep are still lost. Many of Christ’s sheep were children and infants when they died. Others had not yet heard about Christ when they died. Others had heard, but had not yet fully understood the gospel. They are still Christ’s sheep as long as they are in the Book of Life. Christ only gives up on His sheep if they willfully and knowingly reject His salvation. Until then, he still considers them to be His sheep. Not even death changes this fact. Unless and until they willfully and knowingly reject Christ’s salvation, they will remain in the Book of Life during the millennium. Many, however, will reject Christ during the millennium, while He reigns as the literal King of the world. We can see this in Rev 20:7-10, when Satan is released after the thousand years to tempt the nations again. At that time, multitudes march against Christ. The Rest of the Dead Revelation 20:4-5 says that the souls of those beheaded for not taking the mark of the beast are resurrected. Nothing is said about those who die in Christ before the great tribulation. A literal interpretation of these verses would say that only those who are missing a head are resurrected at the start of the millennium. And the “rest” of the dead must wait until the end if the millennium. Of course, this interpretation is not in agreement with 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, which says those who are in Christ are all raised before those who are still alive are gathered. The interpretation of this verse can be difficult. Pre-millennialists usually interpret this verse to say that all those who are in Christ are resurrected at the start of the millennium, and all those not in Christ are not resurrected until after the millennium. Even though this verse is difficult to interpret, they impose this interpretation back on the much more simple and precise verses such as Daniel 12:1-3 and John 5:28-29. The “hour” must either be stretched into a millennium, or the hour must become two separate hours separated by a millennium.
A much more consistent and reasonable interpretation of these verses would be that the “rest of the dead” are those who take the mark. This is in the context of the passage. John only sees those who refused the mark. Therefore, the “rest” are those who take the mark. They are not resurrected. They stay dead, and do not “come to life” until the Book of Life is opened and they are thrown into the lake of fire. During the tribulation, those who take the mark of the beast will be willfully and knowingly rejecting Christ. So their names will be blotted from the Book of Life. This happens to all the wicked, who willfully and knowingly reject the salvation of our Lord and Savior, Christ Jesus. Amillennialists believe that the just and the unjust are raised at the same time. Premillennialists believe that there is a thousand years between the resurrection and the Great White Throne of Judgment. Both are correct. Amillennialists are incorrect in saying that the Great White Throne happens at the resurrection. Premillennialists are incorrect in saying that the unjust are not raised until after the millennium. Both are incorrect. And both are correct. The truth hides in the middle.
A Perfect Plan of Salvation from a Perfect God Would not a perfect God come up with a perfect plan of salvation? Romans 2:11 tells us that God does not show favoritism. God loves each and every one of us equally. Would God allow His one and only Son to die for our sins, and not come up with some way for each and every one of us to benefit equally from that sacrifice? God’s character includes love, justice, and impartiality. This plan of salvation, presented in this book, is the only one that shows no partiality. Some people will receive eternal life before others. That’s simply part of God’s plan. God uses the first ones saved to bring the good news of salvation to everybody else. In the scheme of eternity, the order is not important if all eventually have the same opportunity to hear and accept. God’s perfect plan does not neglect the majority of all people who have lived; those who have died without hearing about Christ. Given God’s character of love, justice, and impartiality, is it reasonable to believe that Scripture can be literally and naturally interpreted in the way that is presented in this book, and yet be incorrect? It is reasonable to believe an imperfect plan of salvation over a perfect plan of salvation for the sake of traditional interpretation? Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), both have systems of salvation that do not include punishment for those who have never heard. It’s my belief that this is one of the big draws which those two growing churches have. Many people who know God’s character have big problems with the system of salvation presented by the mainstream denominations. Mainstream salvation doctrines simply do not fit God’s character. However, the systems of salvation presented by Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons are also imperfect and show favoritism. They each offer a greater level eternal salvation for those who join their church. Everyone who was born before these churches existed would not have the same opportunity for the same type of salvation. God’s true perfect plan of salvation shows no favoritism. A very knowledgeable atheist told me, that if God were to exist, then God would be his worst enemy. How many people have been deceived about God, and stayed away from the churches, because of incorrect mainstream doctrinal teachings about salvation? The Dichotomy of Verses about Salvation Scripture holds a potentially confusing dichotomy of verses about salvation and about entering the kingdom of heaven. Notice that all the holiness verses are about entering or inheriting the kingdom of heaven. The salvation verses are simply about salvation.
Is inheriting the kingdom really the same thing as salvation? Also, consider John 5:28-29, quoted earlier. How does this verse fit with our doctrines of salvation by grace and through faith alone? Those who do good are to be raised to a resurrection of life. Those who do evil are evil are to be raised to a resurrection of judgment. Many translations even say they are raised to a resurrection of condemnation. How is this any different than salvation by works, or salvation by one’s own merit? However, under the New Wine System, this verse is not talking about salvation. It’s taking about inheriting the kingdom. Some people have noticed this dichotomy of teaching between Paul’s message of grace and Jesus’ stark message of holiness, which seems even stricter than that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law. The Sermon on the Mount clearly takes the Ten Commandments, such as to not commit adultery, and brings them to a deeper level. We are not to look at a woman in lust. Anger toward our brother is tantamount to murder. Is the message of Jesus truly a message of salvation by grace? By reading Scripture the way ancient Jews would have read Scripture, it’s possible to rectify the interpretation that causes this dichotomy of verses. We must understand that salvation is a journey. Peter said, “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). In addition, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). The Greek word here for “way” means road. Salvation is a journey. It’s a path that we must take. For some, this journey does not end when we die. The journey can continue throughout the millennium. And for many, the journey will not even begin until the resurrection and Christ returns. The journey must be the path of Jesus Christ. The path begins with justification (Rom 5:15-19). When, by faith, we accept Jesus Christ as our Savior, God credits the atoning sacrifice of Christ on the cross as payment for all our sins, past, present, or future. But this is only the beginning of our journey toward salvation. We continue with the process of sanctification (1 Thess 4:3, 5:23, 2 Thess 2:13, 1 Peter 1:2). Through the Holy Spirit, we are being conformed into the likeness of Christ (Rom. 8:29-30, Eph. 1:5). The journey ends with the glorification of our bodies (1 Cor. 15:50). We were saved (Rom. 8:24), we are being saved (1 Cor. 1:18), and we will be saved (Rom. 5:10). Salvation must include justification, sanctification, and finally the glorification of our bodies. For those who are mature in Christ, the glorification of our bodies will happen when Christ returns. For many, however, the glorification of their bodies must wait until they are entirely sanctified during the millennium. The road toward salvation is the maturing process whereby we “work out our salvation with fear and trembling” (Phil 2:12). But not all those who are justified in Christ seem to take this part of the salvation process seriously. These are known as carnal Christians. This word comes from the King James Version, especially in 1 Corinthians 3:1. Modern-day translations render it as fleshly, or worldly. From 1 Corinthians 2:14 to 3:3, Paul outlines three types of people. In verse 14 of chapter 2, Paul speaks of the natural man. In verse 1 of chapter 3 Paul speaks of the fleshly (carnal) man. Third, in verse 15 of chapter 2, Paul speaks of the spiritual man. This is Paul’s letter to the problem-ridden church at Corinth. Paul addresses them as carnal Christians. Yet Paul makes it clear that they are saved (1 Cor 1:2 9). Just how much sanctification is required before we can reach the end of the road to receive glorified bodies? Do those who die carnal reach the end of the road without traveling over it? Some would hold that the initial justification of Christians is all that matters. After all, they say, what could we possibly add to the blood of Christ? How can the blood of Christ need anything else? Many Protestants of the Reformation, with emphasis on grace, will argue that while we should be sanctified, it’s not required for salvation. They claim, “Once saved always saved.” Some will compromise and say that those who remain carnal were not saved in the first place. But this is just another way of saying that sanctification is required for salvation. Scripture clearly indicates that sanctification is required for salvation in the verses preached by the holiness groups. Yet Scripture also clearly indicates that we are saved at the point of justification. One major purpose of this book is to show that both sides are true. The truth hides in the middle. If we confess with our mouths that Jesus is Lord, and believe in our hearts that Jesus rose from the dead, then we will be saved. This is true even if we live a carnal life and die carnal. At the same time, we must mature in Christ, and be sold out for Christ, no matter the cost, before we can receive glorified bodies and inherit the kingdom of God. We don’t get a free “get out of sanctification” ticket when we die. Those who are sold out for Christ, no matter the cost, are the elect. We are chosen by God to reign with Christ during the millennium. To reign, we must become saints. The Word “Saint”, as it’s Used in This Book The Catholic use the word “saint,” does not mean all who will be saved. It’s a special word given to the holiest of Christians. The concept of saints in this book is probably closer to the Catholic belief than it is to the Protestant belief. The Protestant belief is that all who are saved become saints when they first profess faith in Jesus. The Catholic belief is that saints are a special list of those who become really holy, in this life before they die. I believe that saints are those who really mature in Christ. At the same time, there are still many carnal Christians who will be saved and resurrected in the millennium. Paul often used the term “saints” to address the entire church to which he was writing. Protestants have used this as an argument against the Catholic use of the term. In the Greek, the word “saint” is the same word as in “Holy Spirit.” It means “Holy Ones.” It’s translated as “saints” when it’s in the plural noun form, and in a context that speaks of God’s people. The use of “holy” to refer to God’s people originates in the Old Testament, especially in Psalms and in Daniel. We refer to everybody in the churches as Christians. But we know that in the churches, not everyone is a true Christians. I believe Paul used the word saint in a very similar way. Not everyone in the churches will become a saint. The word “saint” is similar to the term “salvation.” We were saved, we are being saved, and we will be saved. We became a saint, we are a saint, and we will be a saint when we have matured in Christ to overcome sin. Paul is hopeful that all those in his churches will mature in Christ, and become saints. Yet Paul realizes that not everyone will do so before death. In this book, I prefer to use the word “saint” in a way similar to the Catholic use of the word. Saints are those who have matured in Christ and are walking as Jesus walked (1 John 2:6), which is to walk holy. The saints are those who mature in Christ before they die, and before Christ returns. The saints are the wise, who will reign with Christ in the millennium. The Purpose Driven Life Rick Warren’s book titled, The Purpose Driven Life, has sold over 30 million copies worldwide. The book has forty chapters that describe forty points to ponder and questions to consider. The reader is encouraged to read one chapter a day, towards the forty-day goal of having a life whose purpose is devoid of self and centered on God’s purpose for our lives. Living such a life involves the rejection of sin in our lives. Sin has no dominion over those with a Purpose Driven Life. Many Christians have believed in a higher level of Christianity as being completely sold out for Christ. Some have associated it with baptism of the Holy Spirit. (It does relate to being constantly filled with the Holy Spirit.) We must live for Christ, no matter the cost. Those who believe there is a higher form of Christianity generally do not say it’s required for salvation. And yet many of the holiness verses, involving inheriting the kingdom, can be interpreted as being about salvation. It’s easy to get excited about pursuing a Purpose Driven Life. Yet it doesn’t seem to fit anywhere in the traditional doctrines of salvation. Therefore after some time, it tends to lose its importance because it’s not a clear part of our traditional systematic theology. It seems like a good thing, but it’s not required for salvation. Down deep, when temptation is at its greatest, people can reason that we get to heaven anyway. We yield to temptation, believing that God’s purpose can wait. If God really has a purpose for each of us, and if it’s really God’s intention that we grow to the point where our lives really are centered solely around God’s purpose for us, then why would God settle for anything less? One way or the other, God will have His way in our lives, unless we explicitly and knowingly reject God and His purpose. Traditionally, there are two types of people: those saved and those not saved. The New Wine System presents three types of people: the wise, the foolish, and the wicked. If one really believes in a higher level of Christianity, which is not required for salvation, then a system of theology with three types of people would seem to be the only system that works. The wise are those who live a Purpose Driven Life. The wicked are those who have rejected God’s salvation and God’s purposes. The foolish have not yet gone one way or the other.
What do you think about when you are driving, and your mind is free to wander? This is a good indicator of what your interests are. If your thoughts are not on furthering the Kingdom, then you are probably not Living a Purpose Driven Life for Christ. How do you spend most of your free time? Is it watching TV, movies, or sports? If it’s not doing something to further the Kingdom, then you are probably not Living a Purpose Driven Life for Christ. Does your prayer life include a balanced amount of time asking God what you can do for the Kingdom? Do you pray for open doors to your personal Person Driven Life and services? If not, you are probably not Living a Purpose Driven Life. These points are not meant to be condemning in nature. The bottom line is that Christ really must be the first and the only really important thing in your life. The importance of Christ in your life must even outshine that of your family (Matthew 12:46-50, Mark 3:31-35). Ancient Jewish Thought Ancient Jews understood the coming of the Messiah as being the start of a new age, with Israel bringing salvation to the world as a result of their rule (Isaiah 66:16 21). The Messianic age was not the end of the story. It was the best part of the story. Both the Pharisees and the Sadducees believed in a coming Messianic age. The big debate was whether or not there will be a resurrection at the start of it all. Everyone agreed, that when the Messiah comes, Israel would rule the nations. The big debate was the resurrection. Righteousness will go out from Israel to all the nations when Israel rules the nations (Zech 14:13-19). The coming of the Messiah was not considered to be the final judgment for everyone. With the resurrection at the start of the Messianic age, as was believed by the Pharisees, death would not be the final judgment. The resurrection would be a continuation of the story for everyone. Since Augustine, the high majority of the churches, both Catholic and Protestant, have not believed in the millennium. Luther was a big fan of Augustine, and so the Protestants tended to reject the millennium. The Anabaptists were persecuted and put to death for their millennial beliefs. It’s not surprising that our traditional doctrines of salvation have not required a millennium. The Day of Judgment, and end of the world, was believed to be when Christ returns. But this view about the coming of the Messiah does not fit ancient Jewish thought. The Messianic reign was to be a time when Israel would rule the world, and thus the gospel would go out into the entire world as a result of that reign. The kingdom of heaven, interpreted the way a New Testament Jew would have interpreted it, is this same Messianic reign. What they didn’t understand was that Christ was to come twice. The current Messianic reign in our hearts is only a partial fulfillment. It will be literally and completely fulfilled when Christ returns. This delay in the literal kingdom did not change its purpose. It’s still a time for the Messiah to reign so that God’s salvation can be spread across the entire world, even after the resurrection. During the literal reign of Christ, this gospel-spreading purpose of the kingdom is fulfilled to a much greater extent than right now during its partial fulfillment. The ancient Jews did not understand the need for the Messiah to first die as the ultimate sacrifice for their sins. They thought the Kingdom of God was going to appear at once (Luke 19:11-27). Secondly, they did not realize that Gentiles would be included in Israel (Acts 10:45). They did not understand that being a descendant of Abraham does not guarantee citizenship in the true Israel that will rule the nations (Rom 9:7-8). You must first overcome sin to obtain holiness, through the sanctification of the Holy Spirit, before you can rule the nations with Christ (Rev 2:26-27). Righteous Gentiles Ancient Jews believed that they were the chosen people. They alone had the covenant relationship with God that made Israel a chosen nation. Does this mean that ancient Jews considered Gentiles to all be predestined for God’s wrath simply because they were born as Gentiles? Perhaps some Jews believed this. But many first-century Jews believed that Gentiles could be righteousness before God without actually becoming Jewish. In his book “Paul and the Gentiles: Remapping the Apostle’s Convictional Word,” (pages 68-69), Terence L. Donaldson writes:
(Underline emphasis mine.) No doubt many first-century Jews believed there is a middle-group of “righteous Gentiles,” who are righteous before God, yet are not a part of God’s chosen people. Many of these Jews believed the “righteous Gentiles” would be resurrected to share in the Messianic age to come. Those who had a heart for Gentiles would have had this belief. It’s not hard to believe that Saul (later named Paul) had a heart for Gentiles. After his conversion, he devoted himself to bringing the gospel to the Gentiles. The following verses strongly suggest that Paul had believed in the middle-group of “righteous Gentiles:”
No doubt all the Jews, including Paul, were surprised that Gentiles could receive the Holy Spirit and be a part of Israel. No doubt Paul was initially surprised that Gentiles could be chosen by God, to be a part of God’s elect. Therefore, Paul preached there is no difference between Jew and Gentile. Both can be a part of true Israel. Does this paradigm shift, of Gentiles being a part of Israel, remove the concept of the middle-group of “righteous Gentiles?” Does this shift in thinking require there be a no middle group? No, because Paul himself spoke of both carnal and spiritual Christians, saying that both are saved. Interpreting Romans 2:12-16 in the context of Paul’s culture would mean that he also believed in three types of people in the grave. Scripture was written mostly by Jews. Paul was Jewish. We must interpret Scripture in the context of first-century Jewish beliefs and culture. One should not say that seeing three types of people in the grave is simply reading something into the verses that is not there. We should not get hung up on our own traditions, which say that everybody goes to either heaven or hell as soon as they die. On the contrary, we should accept the fact that Paul’s training and traditions included the middle group known as “righteous Gentiles.” Therefore, we cannot simply assume that when Paul said, “inherit the kingdom,” that he was strictly taking about salvation, with no middle group. We must use Scripture alone to build our theology. But we must guard against the assumptions of traditional church beliefs. We must guard against our tendency to force Paul’s words into our traditional two-type system when Paul himself would have grown up in the traditions of a three-type system. Election vs. Free-Will Solved The New Wine System presents three types of people: the wise, the foolish, and the wicked. The wise would correspond to Israel. The foolish would correspond to righteous Gentiles. The wicked are wicked. When ancient Jewish eschatology is applied to the Church, all Old Testament Scripture is fulfilled in the Church. Just as Israel is God’s chosen people, the Church is the elect. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile (Romans 10:12). There is no difference between Israel and the Church. The Church is those chosen by God to be drawn into a mature relationship with Jesus Christ before they die, or before Christ returns. The foolish middle group is the nations. They can still be saved. Everyone has the free-will opportunity to accept or reject Christ. Therefore, there is no paradox between election and free-will. You don’t have to explain it all by saying it’s two sides of the same coin. You don’t have to say it’s like two parallel lines that come together only in some far distance place. You don’t have to say election and free-will are both true, but that it cannot be understood. It’s simple when it’s understood there are three types of people in the grave. The Millennium as an Alternative to Purgatory According to the New Wine System, those who die without spiritual maturity can continue their sanctification during the Messianic age. Those who still have sinful habits can still overcome their sinful habits in the millennium. Some will see this as a kind of Purgatory. It does solve the same problem that Purgatory was intended to solve. Catholics saw the dichotomy of Scripture and reasoned that only the most holy people (saints) could go straight to heaven. Everyone else would have to be punished in Purgatory for his or her sins. Purgatory, however, is not found in Scripture. But the millennium is Scriptural. Augustine and the Catholics assumed a Purgatory, possibly because Augustine had eliminated the millennial earthly reign of Christ. This elimination of the millennium forced Catholic scholars to view death as the end of the story. (This is Greek thinking.) So Purgatory was needed to solve this dichotomy of Scripture verses about salvation. The millennial reign of Christ is not a time of punishment. Unlike Purgatory, sanctification during the millennial reign of Christ maintains the full atonement for our sins as a free gift. The millennial reign of Christ will be a much better life than our current lives under the reign of Satan and the rule of sinful men. The purpose of Purgatory is for the punishment of sins. The purpose of the millennium is to give everyone the opportunity to overcome sin through sanctification by the Holy Spirit. Those who have not yet overcome sin will be resurrected, but not into spiritual bodies. The saints will rule over them as priests and kings, having already received their spiritual bodies.
Verse 27, here, is a quote of Psalm 2:9, which is about Christ’s reign.
The Greek word for “rule,” in Revelation 2:27, means shepherd. Christ does not destroy the nations he rules. He is their shepherd. Those who overcome sin will reign with Christ as priests and kings. These are the saints. The nations are those who will have not yet overcome sin. These saints are not the canonized saints of the Catholic Church. These saints are all who will have matured in Christ before they die. God has his own list of saints. There are, however, many canonized saints who are real saints on God’s list of saints. Also there are, without doubt, many Protestant saints as well. Only God has the real list. God’s desire is for us to overcome sin and be adopted as sons along with Christ. We will be “God's children, since [we] are children of the resurrection” (Luke 20:36). The true Church is the true Israel. Those who are truly saints are the true Israel. We must first become mature in Christ, having a Purpose Driven Life, before receiving glorified bodies in the true Israel of the millennium. What Does it Mean to be Sold Out for Christ? During the Lord’s Supper, the evening before the crucifixion, Jesus went around the room and washed the disciples’ feet. This made Peter very reluctant to have his Lord wash is feet.
Jesus was teaching Peter, and the other disciples, a lesson that he would not understand until after the resurrection. Why was this lesson so important for Peter to learn, that Jesus told him without it Peter could not be his disciple? How many people today have not learned this lesson, and have not taken it to heart, yet consider themselves disciples of Jesus? There are two types of resurrections. We can be resurrected with flesh bodies to see the kingdom. Or we can be resurrected with glorified spiritual bodies to inherit the kingdom. What does it take to be resurrected with a glorified spiritual body? What does it take to inherit the kingdom? Salvation is a free gift. Salvation is by grace alone. People can be saved from their first death, and resurrected to see the kingdom as a free gift. But for those, there is the possibility of a second death (Rev. 20:6, 20:14, 21:8). Those who inherit the kingdom, however, also inherit eternal life. For them, who work to overcome sin, there is not a second death (Rev. 2:11). Salvation is a free gift. But it takes work to inherit the kingdom. The lesson that Peter and the disciples were about to learn is the difference between being resurrected to see the kingdom, and being resurrected to inherit the kingdom.
The difference between being resurrected with a spiritual body, and being resurrected with a natural body, is one’s maturity in Christ. We must have Purpose Driven Life. In the kingdom of heaven, the last shall be first, and the first shall be last (Mat. 19:29-30, 20:16).
The wise are servants. Those who will reign as kings and priests in the age to come must first develop a servant’s heart in this age. Being a minister for Christ is not about building big churches. It’s about loving and acting on that love. Jesus continues teaching at the Last Supper:
Again, notice the condition on being Christ’s disciple. The condition is that we love one another. Christians get caught up in the things of this world, and their love grows cold. They are still saved. But without the supernatural love from Christ being carried out in a Christian’s life, they won’t be resurrected as one of Christ’s disciples. Did Peter, at this time, have the love for Christ that is necessary to be one of Christ’s disciples?
Peter believed that he loved Christ enough to die for him. But as we find out later, Peter had not yet developed the maturity in Christ that is needed, especially for those who are to be leaders. And everyone who is to be a priest and king in the millennium must have the maturity and love of Christ to be one of Christ’s leaders. In order to be resurrected with a spiritual body, we must be willing and ready to die for Christ.
Peter had really believed he was ready to die for Christ. But Jesus knew Peter’s true heart. Peter was not yet ready to die for Jesus. And, of course we know that Peter, when put to the test, denied knowing Jesus. This really tore at Peter’s heart when he failed. After this failure, the next time Jesus saw Peter, was after the resurrection. Jesus asked Peter three times, “Do you love me? Let’s take a closer look at what Jesus was asking and telling Peter. In the Greek, there are three different words for ‘love’. Agape love is unconditional love. Philos love is brotherly love. When Jesus asked Peter, “Do you love me,” these two types of love were being used in the conversation. Read these verses using the Greek verbs for love, given in brackets, as if they are adverbs. In other words, when you read these verses, say the Greek words as well as the English words. You will get the idea of what was really being said.
Peter knew that he had failed the test. He had denied Christ because he was afraid for his life. So to Peter’s credit, he was being honest with Christ. Peter’s love for Christ was not unconditional. And the realization of this shortcoming was very painful for Peter. In other words, Peter’s grief over being asked the third time was a completely different type of emotion than it would appear, when read without seeing the two different types of love. Peter was honest in saying “Lord, you know everything.” Peter was honest about his lack of love. Was Jesus calling Peter down for his lack of love? No, Jesus was gently bringing Peter back up, and telling Peter how to bring his love from Philos to Agape. The way to increase our love for God is to increase our love for our neighbor. When Christ said, “feed my sheep,” he was not talking about Peter becoming the pastor of his church. “Feed my sheep” is being a servant to anyone who is in need. “Feed my sheep” is to exercise the Spiritual gifts that God has given us, in love for one another. As our love for Christ increases, our love for our neighbor increases. And as our love for our neighbor increases, our love for Christ increases. In the very next verse, Jesus tells Peter that in the future he will love Christ unconditionally. Jesus does so by telling Peter that in his old age, he really would die for Christ. Normally, this is not something that would brighten one’s day. But in Peter’s case, it’s exactly what he needed to hear.
This is the servant’s heart. This is being a true disciple of Christ, because Christ had only a servant’s heart. No man is greater than his master. Because Christ had only a servant’s heart, Christ’s true disciples will only have a servant’s heart. It’s a love of Christ that amounts to being sold out for Christ, matter the cost. It’s being sold out for Christ, even if it costs us our lives. This, then, is the difference between being resurrected with a natural body, and being resurrected with a spiritual body. This is the difference between seeing the kingdom of heaven, and inheriting the kingdom. This is the difference between being wise in Christ, and being foolish about Christ’s teachings. As Christ has said in several different ways, without [agape] love, you can’t be His disciple. The Watering Down of Christ’s Teaching Unless Jesus washed Peter’s feet, he would not let Peter be a disciple. In other words, unless we live out [AGAPE] love for Christ, instead of just [PHILOS] love, we cannot be Christ’s disciple. Under the traditional two-type system of being on the road to either heaven or hell, Christians tend to believe that Christ would not be so strict. They don’t apply this level of total commitment, of being completely on fire for Christ, as a requirement for being a disciple. Surely if we believe in Christ, and profess him as our Lord and Savior, then we are saved. If we are saved, then we are going to heaven. Yes, the Christian would acknowledge that Christ would like us to be sold out for Him. But being busy with the things of this world, such as making a living, does not send one to hell. They are going to heaven. Right? Going to heaven is all that really matters. This is the obvious conclusion when one is taught the two-type system of heaven and hell. However, under the three-type system of the wise, the foolish, and the wicked, the serious nature of Christ’s teaching comes forth. We want to be counted in the wise group, and not the foolish group. One may say, “I’m not wise. I’m not a teacher. I’m not a preacher. Just let me stay in the comfortable foolish group.” The wise group is wise in Christ. It’s not personal wisdom. It’s wisdom because we live out Christ’s wise teachings, and are thus qualified to lead others. In the age to come, it’s only those who do not seek power for themselves that will be given the power to rule. If you say you are not wise, then that’s the type of person Christ really needs. The meek shall inherit the earth. How Does All This Affect Missions? Some may wonder, “If people can still get saved after the resurrection, then is Christian witness and missions really necessary?” Most definitely, the answer is yes. The basic gospel message of faith in Jesus Christ for salvation has not changed. Everyone needs to ask Jesus to forgive them of their sins, and to take control of their lives. The sooner you fall in love with Jesus the better off you will be. Before Christ returns and the millennium comes, the antichrist will rule the entire world. He will require everyone to take the mark of the beast, which will lead to eternal damnation. There will be no resurrection for those who take the mark of the beast. Jesus said:
During this time of the end, only those who die without taking the mark, or who are able to stand firm to the end, will be saved. The Holy Spirit is needed for that. So the need of missions and Christian witness is greater today than ever before. Christ will not return until people from every nation, tribe, people, and language have turned their lives over to Him. Also, the purpose of this present age is to establish the elect, who will rule as priests and kings in the millennium. Christ will return when the elect are mature. Christ will only return when there are people from every nation, tribe, people, and language, who have matured in Christ enough to reign in Christ’s kingdom. The gospel must be spread to every nation before the end can come (Mat. 24:14). Start Your Journey Now Have you started your journey of faith in Jesus Christ? Jesus is the only way to eternal life. People who have died, having not heard or understood about Christ, are not spending eternity in hell. They will have their chance to begin their journey when Christ returns. But if you have not done so, you should start now. The more you resist Christ’s calling, the more likely it is that you will reach a personal knowledge and understanding about Christ, where your rejection of Christ condemns you to eternal punishment.
This concludes the first chapter of the book, from pages 11 to 42. The entire book is 387 pages. The rest of the book explores many more passages of Scripture, and offers a lot of additional Scriptural evidence for the New Wine System. If you have found this chapter interesting, you will want to order and read the entire book. Also, please tell others about New Wine for the End Times. Philip B. Brown
Philip B. Brown |