|
Problems with the Pre-Tribulation Rapture |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The New Wine System affirms that salvation is a free gift. There is nothing we can do to add to what Christ did for us on the cross. All our sins, past, present, and future, are completely forgiven. While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Salvation cannot be earned by works. Yet, according to the New Wine System, lots of work is required in order to inherit the kingdom. Those of us who are saved must then seek the kingdom of God, and His righteousness. Only those who seek the kingdom will inherit the kingdom. Only those who seek His righteousness to overcome sin will inherit the kingdom. Salvation is a free gift. But to inherit the kingdom requires lots of work. But what does this have to do with the pre-tribulation rapture? The difference between simple salvation and inheriting the kingdom is to truly deny ourselves, and to take up our crosses and follow Christ. Belief in the pre-tribulation rapture is a fearful response our reading of Revelation. And yet Revelation is the only book in the Bible that promises a blessing for reading and taking to heart that which is written within (Revelation 1:1-3). We read Revelation and it scares us. Instead of knowing that God will protect us, we put our faith in the pre-tribulation rapture doctrine, which has no support in Scripture. Verses must be taken out of context, and the natural reading of Scripture must be abandoned. But we do so out of fear. We say we are not meant for God’s wrath. This is true. But neither are the so-called tribulation saints. Are those “left behind” meant for God’s wrath? Or can God protect them? If so, then why do we cling to a pre-tribulation rapture doctrine using such faulty arguments? Again, it’s because of our fear of Revelation. It’s our fear of the great tribulation. It’s because we think about ourselves and our own security more than we think about others. It’s because we have not learned to take up our cross and follow Christ. Our suffering should be as nothing in comparison to the works God would have us do. Paul wrote:
This writing by Paul is the true spirit of one who knows what it means to take up his cross and follow Christ. The pre-tribulation rapture doctrine teaches us that we will be leaving this world when Christian suffering begins. The doctrine teaches that we will be leaving those who suffer, and those who do not know Jesus Christ as their Savior. The doctrine teaches that we want to abandon the ones who will be “left behind.” Such thinking is not the thinking that Paul demonstrated. There is a time of great tribulation coming. It’s in the second half of the seven-year period. However, the first half is a time of great awakening. It’s a time of revival. The spiritual temple of God (as well as the physical temple) will be built during that time. It’s a time when the two witnesses will be preaching. It’s a time when God will be using all of us. It’s a time when there will be a lot more work that left to be done. And don’t fall into a belief in a mid-tribulation rapture either. All the Scriptural evidence indicates the rapture is after the great tribulation. Therefore, God has a purpose for us even in the great tribulation. All things work to the good of those who are called according to His purpose. This includes the great tribulation. Tribulation brings holiness. We must overcome sin before we can inherit the kingdom. We must overcome sin before we can be caught up in the rapture. The New Wine System shows that there is a big difference between simply being saved and inheriting the kingdom. But the pre-tribulation rapture doctrine tends to hide that difference. Jesus told us to watch and be ready for his return. The pre-tribulation rapture doctrine helps convince us that we are ready for the rapture when actually we are not. Only those who are willing to die for Christ, in order to further the kingdom, are actually ready for the rapture. Only those who truly seek the kingdom of God, and his righteousness, and have overcome sin in so doing, are ready for the rapture. There will not be a pre-tribulation rapture because most of the Church is not ready. And there will not be a pre-tribulation rapture because God has more work for us to do, so that we can inherit the kingdom. During the time of great tribulation, many people will take the mark of the beast. This mark is a knowledgeable and explicit rejection of Jesus Christ as Savior. Those who take the mark will no longer have the opportunity for salvation. According to the New Wine System, only those who knowingly and explicitly reject Jesus Christ as Savior will go to hell. Everyone else will still have the continued opportunity to accept Christ as Savior, and to mature in Christ for eternal salvation. But those who take the mark of the beast have rejected their free gift of salvation, and will not be saved. We see people dying all the time without Christ. It has become the norm for us, because we think that only a few will be saved. But the New Wine System shows us that people from every nation, tribe, people, and language is only the tip of the iceberg for the total number of people who will eventually receive eternal life. For those who really care about the eternal souls of others, the time of great tribulation that is coming is the most important time in all of history. We must be there to minimize, as much as possible, the number of people who will take the mark of the beast. They can eventually be saved, even if they die, if they simply do not reject Christ’s salvation by taking the mark. We need to overcome our fear of the great tribulation, and we need to understand and embrace this most important work our Father has for us to do. The purpose of this article is to show that the pre-tribulation rapture doctrine is false. It’s based on taking verses out of context, and upon invalid assumptions. Anyone who simply reads the following two verses in a natural way knows that the rapture is “immediately after the tribulation.” Matthew 24:29-31 says:
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 says:
Are these two verses speaking about the same event, or two different events? Pre-Tribulation advocates claim that 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 is the rapture, and that Matthew 24:29-31 is the “glorious appearing.” Applying two separate terms to these verses makes you interpret it as two separate events. But look at the similarities. If it’s two separate events, then this event happens twice. The word ‘rapture’ comes from the Latin, and means “caught up.” This word has always meant our being gathered into the clouds when Christ returns. And the word was around long before Darby introduced the pre-tribulation rapture in 1830. As we can see, the rapture happens in both of these verses. God’s people are “caught up” into the clouds, by the angels, at the sound of God’s trumpet. However, since Matthew 24:29 clearly states it happens after the tribulation, pre-tribulation rapture advocates must believe these are two separate events. |
New Wine for the End Times
(NIV Revelation 1:3) Blessed is the one who reads the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Two men working; two women grinding No pre-tribulation rapture advocate doubts there is also a post-tribulation gathering of the elect. Some will say Matthew 24:31 is not a gathering into the clouds, but instead it’s a gathering to Jerusalem. But this does not fit the context of even Matthew 24 itself. Verse 40 and 41 speak of two men in the field. One is taken and the other is left. Two women will be grinding grain. One will be taken and the other one will be left. In Luke 17:34-35 we see an account of the two women grinding with one taken and the other left. We also see two people in bed at night. One is taken and the other is left. This can only be interpreted as a disappearance of some people during their ordinary chores. Do they disappear and then re-appear in Jerusalem? No, Jerusalem is not mentioned in the passage. This disappearance of people is in the very same context as Matthew 24:31, where the angels in the clouds “gather together his elect.” By context, they are gathered into the clouds to where the angels are doing the gathering. How can this event not be the rapture? Bottom line is verse 29, in which this gathering is to be “immediately after the tribulation of those days.” Some with argue the disappearance of people while in bed or working is the rapture, but that the gathering of the elect, in verse 31, is a different event. The pre-tribulation advocate would likewise believe the date that “no one knows the day or the hour” to be the pre-tribulation rapture. The problem with both of these views is context. Verse 36 says, “No one knows about that day or hour.” The gathering of the elect is just five verses earlier. That’s the context of the day that no one knows about. To say there is another day that no one knows about, in which people disappear from their beds, is to take these verses completely out of the context of the gathering of the elect in verse 31. A pre-tribulation rapture event is not mentioned in the passage. In order for the unknown day and hour to refer to a pre-tribulation rapture event, such an event would have to be included in the text. Likewise, the text of the description of men in the field and the women grinding grain follows the text for the gathering of the elect. Context dictates that these verses are also describing the gathering of the elect that’s mentioned in the passage. Two men are working in the field. Two women are grinding at the hand mill. Two people are in bed at night. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates ask whether Christians and non-Christians would be working together at the end of the tribulation. The answer is yes. I think there will be lots of people left who have not taken the mark, but are not yet ready for the rapture. Perhaps they will be in poorer countries like India, which are not dependent on computers for buying and selling. If they have not taken the mark, they will simply live with natural bodies into the millennium. Read Luke 17:24-37. Verse 36 says the two women are grinding grain together, and one is taken. The disciples ask, “Where, Lord.” The answer given is, “Where there is a dead body, there the vultures will gather.” This corresponds to Matthew 24:28, which is unquestionably in the post-tribulation time frame. In other words, God’s people disappear in the same time frame as Armageddon. We can also see this in Revelation 16:15-16. Christ comes as a thief (verse 15) right before Armageddon (verse 16). The gathering of the vultures at Armageddon can also be seen in Revelation 19:24. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates have pointed out that the disappearance of people while in bed or working must be the rapture because it’s in a time when people are saying peace and safety. It will be as in the “days of Noah … before the flood, [when] people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark” (NIV Matthew 24:38-39). The argument is based on an incorrect assumption that during the 42-month reign of the antichrist, the bowls of wrath will be poured out. This does not seem to fit a time similar to the days of Noah before the flood. However, the book of Revelation does not teach that the bowls of wrath will be poured out during the 42-month reign of the antichrist. This timeline of Revelation originally comes from Dispensationalists, who teach the pre-tribulation rapture. I believe the correct interpretation of Revelation’s timeline is that the bowls of God’s wrath are poured out on the day of the Lord, after the last-day resurrection. Assuming this is true, the 42-month reign of the antichrist really will be a time of “peace and safety” for the world. It will be time of great tribulation only for those who profess Christ as Savior. For the world, however, it will be a time of buying, selling, and building. The sudden destruction that will come is the seven bowls of God’s wrath. The first six occur during a 45-day period after the resurrection.
The 42-month reign of the antichrist will be after a false Armageddon. In Revelation, the false Armageddon is the sixth trumpet. A third of mankind will be killed. It will be World War III. After this, people will cry out for peace and safety. Because of World War III, the nations will turn over their sovereignty to the antichrist. And for the world, it will be a time of peace and safety. But for those who profess Christ as Savior, it will be the time of great tribulation. Then, after the 42- months, Christ will return. It will be a time like the days of Noah. Sudden destruction will come when Christ returns after the 42-month reign of the antichrist Is being ‘gathered’ different from being ‘caught-up’? Pre-tribulation rapture advocates have also argued that the verb “to gather,” used in Matthew 24:31, has a different meaning from the verb “to be caught-up,” used in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. The verb in 1 Thessalonians 4:17 means to “take by force; take away, carry off, or catch up.” In John 10:12 the word is used for a wolf snatching sheep. So it is a much stronger word. But does this stronger verb indicate it’s a different event, or does it indicate that Paul was describing the same event with a bit more excitement? It’s easy to show that the latter is the case. We can simply look at another verse where Paul makes reference to the rapture, without using the stronger verb. Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians apparently caused some confusion. He states that the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night (5:2). People apparently were saying the day of the Lord had already come, so the rapture could happen at any moment now. In response, Paul writes a second letter. Paul writes:
The Greek word used for “being gathered” in this verse is the noun form of the verb used in Matthew 24:31 for “shall gather.” It doesn’t have exactly the same Strong’s Concordance number because one is a noun and the other is a verb. But the spelling in the Greek is almost identical, and the meaning of the two words is identical, except that one is a noun and the other is a verb. To say that Matthew 24:31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 are different events because they are different verbs simply does not hold up when 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2 is also considered. Paul was simply describing the same event with more excitement. Let’s look at it another way. The event of 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 is called the rapture. The event of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2 is the same event, and therefore can also be called the rapture. Since this event uses an almost identical word in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2 as in Matthew 24:31, the event of Matthew 24:31 can also be called the rapture. The event of Mathew 24:31 occurs immediately after the great tribulation, according to verse 29. Therefore, we must either conclude that this post-tribulation event is the rapture, or we must conclude there are two rapture events. Chart of Pre/Post Tribulation Attributes Thus, there is a rapture event after the tribulation. The question is whether or not there is also a rapture of God’s people that happens before the tribulation. Let’s take a look at all the attributes of the assumed pre-tribulation rapture in relation to the Scripture-proven post-tribulation rapture event. Are there really two raptures? Or is there just one?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So, does the rapture happen once or twice? And likewise, does the resurrection happen once or twice? The verse in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 says the resurrection occurs prior to the rapture. But in Revelation 20:4, those who were beheaded because of the testimony of Jesus are resurrected. The resurrection in Revelation 20:4 is the “first” resurrection. How can it be the “first” resurrection if there was also a resurrection at the start of the tribulation? They come to life and reign with Christ a thousand years. This is clearly speaking of those who are martyred during the tribulation. So, if you believe in a pre-tribulation rapture, there must be two raptures and two resurrections. And both resurrections must be “first.” In the Gospel of John, Jesus often associates the resurrection with the last day (John 6:39-44, 6:54, 11:24, 12:48). If there are two resurrections, are not there also two last days? But how many days can be last? If there is a pre-tribulation rapture, then Matthew 24:37, 24:39, 1 Corinthians 15:23, 1 Thessalonians 4:15, and 2 Thessalonians 2:1 would all say that the coming (Parousia) of our Lord Jesus Christ occurs before the tribulation. Yet Matthew 24:3, 24:27, 2 Thessalonians 2:8, and 2:9 all show the coming (Parousia) of our Lord to be after the tribulation. Does the coming (Parousia) of our Lord happen twice? If there is a pre-tribulation rapture, then Matthew 24:43-44 and 1 Thessalonians 5:1-4 would say that the thief in the night is before the tribulation. But Revelation 16:15 shows us the thief comes after the sixth bowl of wrath, and before Armageddon. Does the thief in the night come twice? So if you believe in the pre-tribulation rapture, you must believe the the rapture would have to happen twice, the resurrection twice, thief in the night twice, and the coming (Parousia) of Christ would all have to happen twice. Does Scripture ever teach that Christ returns twice? (Acts 1:11, Col. 3:4, 1 Thess. 1:10, 5:23, 2 Thess. 2:1, 2:8, 1 Tim. 6:14, 2 Tim. 4:1, 4:8, Titus 2:13, Heb. 9:28, Rev. 22:20) | (KJV 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17) For
the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel,
and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we
which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet
the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
(KJV Revelation 20:4-5) And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12 Most people try to read Matthew 24 in context. We read the Scripture with careful “exegesis.” The American Heritage Dictionary says this word means, “Critical explanation or analysis, especially of a text.” This means we try to understand what the author meant to say by following the author’s flow of thought, and by carefully looking at the context of the text. In Matthew 24, Jesus mentions the prophet Daniel. The abomination of desolation can be found in Daniel 9 and also in Daniel 12. But few have really tried to interpret Matthew 24 with Daniel 12 as its major background text. Doing so brings forth obvious interpretations of Matthew 24 that are a bit harder to see without this background material. In Matthew 24, Jesus makes reference to the abomination of desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel. Many people go to Daniel for specifics of the abomination. Most go to Daniel 9. But few people realize Daniel 12 has all the major teachings of Matthew 24. When we compare Daniel 12 to Matthew 24, many confusing points about Matthew 24 become clear. The problem is that many verses of Daniel 12, for years, have been taken out of context. How often is Daniel 12 studied as a whole, in one context? I hope to show that a good understanding of Daniel 12 is essential for the proper understanding of Matthew 24. And when we properly understand Matthew 24, any arguments for the pre-tribulation rapture disappear. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daniel 12 is a condensed Olivet Discourse.
Traditionally, the “time, times, and half a time” of Daniel 12:7 has been thought to mean three and a half years. And without doubt, the “time, times, and half a time” of Daniel 7:25 is three and a half years. “The saints are handed over to him for” three and a half years. This is the 42 months of Revelation 13:5. But does that necessarily mean the “time, times, and half a time” of Daniel 12:7 is also three and a half years? It’s my feeling that people have misinterpreted the question because they have assumed the answer. The question was, “How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?” (KJV Daniel 12:6) When it’s read naturally, the start of this time period is the time in which the question is asked. But since people have believed they knew the answer, they have assumed a start of the period that’s not given in the text of the question. Plus, what is the more natural question to have been asked? If you were told for the first time about this greatest tribulation of all time, and then the resurrection, would you not want to know when it will happen? Another point to consider is that the “time, times, and half a time” of Daniel 7:25 and Daniel 12:7 do not use the same Hebrew / Aramaic words. Both have the pattern of singular, plural, and half of the singular. But it’s not the same word. One is in Hebrew and the other is in Aramaic. In the case of Daniel 12:7, the word has more of the meaning of an era. So someone reading it in the original languages would not be so quickly convinced that the two are the same as someone reading both in English, where are both translated the same. Daniel didn’t understand the answer to the question. Daniel was told that the understanding of the answer is sealed until the time of the end, which according to verse 13 is the time of the resurrection. If the answer to the question is three and a half years, why would the understanding have been sealed, and then plainly stated in verse 11? 1290 days is about three and a half years. But that can’t be the answer because the answer is sealed. We have incorrectly assumed the answer and thus we have misread the question. Our incorrect assumption about the answer has effectively sealed our understanding of the question and its answer over the centuries. The question being asked is the big mystery question. It’s what everybody wants to know. It’s, “When will all this happen?” Again, the question reads, “How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?” (KJV Daniel 12:6) The question does not specify a starting point. Therefore, the question is asking how long, from the time the question was asked, until the resurrection. | (KJV Daniel 12:1-2) And at that time shall
Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a
time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time
thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. [2] And many of
them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame
and everlasting contempt.
(KJV Daniel 12:6) And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders? (KJV Matthew 24:3) And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? (KJV Daniel 12:8-10) And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? [9] And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. [10] Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. (KJV Matthew 24:36) But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. (KJV Daniel 12:11) And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. (KJV Daniel 12:12) Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. (KJV Daniel 12:13) But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With this background of Daniel 12 in place, let’s take another look at Matthew 24. The disciples asked the same question, “When will all this happen?” To be accurate, “all this” was in reference to the destruction of the temple. But the disciples’ question also asked for the signs of Christ’s coming (Parousia), and the end of the age. The disciples, at that time, didn’t understand that the destruction of the temple would not happen at the time of the resurrection. But they seemed to be familiar with the concept of the end of the age, as taught by Daniel 12. They seemed to understand that Christ would return at the time of the end. No doubt Jesus had taught his disciples about the prophet Daniel. This very same teaching can be found in the parable and symbol we know as the thief in the night. Refer to the section below about the thief in the night. A study of that parable and of all the uses of the symbol shows that it’s only the world (wicked) who will be surprised. The wise will understand and know the day and hour of Christ’s return. “But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief” (1 Thessalonians 5:4). Jesus gives a few early signs, such as wars, famines, and earthquakes. Jesus says these are the beginnings of the birth pains, which is a reference to Isaiah 26:17-21. The woman who gives birth is symbolic of the resurrection. See the section titled, “The Woman About to Give Birth,” in the article titled, “Problems with Dispensationalism” for more information. This article also ties the earthquakes to the birth pains. Next, Jesus gives us the major sign for which we are to watch. Daniel 12:11 tells us that from the abomination to the resurrection (by context) there are 1290 days. So Jesus gives the same major sign. The abomination of Daniel 11:31 was fulfilled in 168 BC by a statue of Zeus on the temple mount. This would indicate the abomination to come is also a statue on the temple mount for the world to worship. While we should also consider the abomination of Daniel 9, it’s most likely that Jesus was primarily referring to this abomination in Daniel 12, because Daniel 12 has so many parallels to the Olivet Discourse. Notice the verse again: “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand)” (Matthew 24:15). Considering the background of Daniel 12, what is the reader to understand? This is not the reader of Matthew. It had not yet been written when Jesus said these words. Jesus is talking about the reader of Daniel. And Daniel had been told that not even the wise would understand the answer to the question until the time of the end (Daniel 12:8-10). The wicked will not understand, but the wise will understand at the time of the end. Jesus is saying that when we see the abomination, then the wise reader of Daniel should understand the answer to the big mystery question. The reader of Daniel will know the number of days until the resurrection. But that won’t happen until the time of the end. And then only the wise will understand. So Jesus is saying let the reader be one of the wise who will understand. In verse 21, Jesus tells us about the time of “great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” This corresponds to Daniel 12:1, which speaks of the “time of tribulation such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then.” After the time of great tribulation is the resurrection (Daniel 12:2). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
But the disciples were not asking about the resurrection. They were asking about the second (Parousia) coming of Christ. It would seem from Daniel 12:13, that the second coming happens 45 days after the resurrection. Jesus describes details of the second (Parousia) coming (Matthew 24:27) as the blowing of the trumpet and God’s chosen being gathered into the clouds. Later on, this omission of the resurrection would cause some confusion in the church of the Thessalonians. Some of them had died since the time of Christ, and there was concern as to whether or not their loved ones would see the second (Parousia) coming. But Paul assures them that the resurrection would happen first (1 Thessalonians 4:15). So Paul comforts them with these words (1 Thessalonians 4:18). Paul is not introducing another second (Parousia) coming (1 Thessalonians 4:15) of Christ. | (KJV Matthew 24:27) For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the (Parousia) coming of the Son of man be. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After describing the second (Parousia) coming, Jesus tells the parable of the fig tree. Many people believe the fig tree is the nation of Israel. But Jesus could simply be giving a small parable about watching for signs themselves. A better way to see the nation of Israel in the Olivet Discourse is to look over at Luke 21:24. "And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled" (Luke 21:24). In 70 AD, the Jews were taken as prisoners to all the nations. Today, for the first time since 70 AD, Jerusalem is no longer being trampled on by the Gentiles. Therefore, the time of the Gentiles is fulfilled. At least it’s fulfilled within the adult generation that saw Israel take Jerusalem in 1967. When the fig tree’s leaves get tender, we know that summer is near. I believe the generation that does not pass away, until all the signs have happened, is the baby boom generation, which started right after World War II. Israel became a nation right after, and as a result of, World War II. So there is no problem in saying that the “summer is near.” The problem lies in the very next sentence. Jesus says, “Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door.” The fig tree is a parable about the signs themselves. Right now the “summer is near.” But we must see “all these things” before we know time “near, right at the door.” “All these things” includes the abomination of desolation and the great tribulation. When we associate the fig tree with Israel, people tend to conclude that it’s already “near, right at the door.” But the Scripture is very clear about this point. We are not “near, right at the door,” until we see the abomination and the tribulation. The Olivet Discourse must be interpreted with the background of Daniel 12. In Daniel 12, the major sign given which precedes the resurrection is the abomination. From the abomination there are 1290 days. The abomination is also the major sign given in Matthew 24. So we are not “near, right at the door” until we see the abomination. Then we will be able to calculate the number of days until the resurrection (1290), as well as to the rapture (1335). | (KJV Matthew 24:32-34) Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: [33] So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. [34] Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Today, pre-tribulation rapture advocates claim that we are already “near, right at the door,” even though we have not yet seen “all these things.” Pre-tribulation rapture advocates have unknowingly deceived many people with this ever since Israel became a nation, and even before. In Luke 21:8, Jesus tells about the many who will come in the name of Jesus and teach, “The time is near.” Jesus says not to follow them. And in the very next verse Jesus says the end will not happen right away. We must see “all these things” before we see the end. We must see “all these things” before there is going to be a resurrection or the rapture. Pre-tribulation teachers don’t like to be associated with Luke 21:8. They say it’s talking about false christs. But false christs do not come in the name of Jesus. And false christs would not say, “The time is near.” False christs would say that christ has already come. Instead, these false teachers are acknowledging that Jesus is the Christ. The “I am he” (ego eimi) in the verse is Jesus referring to himself. In other words, the words of Jesus do not directly quote the false teachers. But even if you insist that these are false christs, would you want to be echoing this bad teaching of false christs? Jesus is clearly telling us the bad teaching which says “the time is near” before we see “all these things.” This is the Doctrine of Imminence, which is this false teaching. Jesus tells us not to follow these false teachers. The baby-boom generation is the generation that sees “summer is near.” We are the generation that will not pass away until we see “all these things.” It’s OK to say the time is getting near as long as it’s clear that the abomination and the tribulation must come first. We can say, “The summer is near.” But to say it can happen at any moment is the false doctrine that Jesus warned us against. From the perspective of the Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12, the wise at the time of the end will understand the answer to the question. From this fact, you can deduce that there would be an end-time generation that can understand the answer to the question. I believe that’s what Jesus was teaching. The wise baby boom generation can understand the answer to the question. The closer we get to the end, the better we can understand. The closer we get to the end, the better the wise will know the day of Christ’s return. And when we see the abomination of desolation, we will have full confirmation and will really know for certain about the calculated day of Christ’s second coming (Parousia). | (KJV Luke 21:7-9) And they asked him, saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be when these things shall come to pass? [8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them. [9] But when ye shall hear of wars and commotions, be not terrified: for these things must first come to pass; but the end is not by and by. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We are continuing to examine Matthew 24 with the background of the Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12. In Matthew 24:36, we read about the unknown day and hour. Then Jesus illustrates his point using the days of Noah, the two men in the field, and the two women grinding at the hand mill. Pre-tribulation advocates insist that the unknown day and hour will remain unknown right up to the point of the rapture itself. But think about it from the perspective of Daniel 12. The big question of Daniel 12 is the same as asked by the disciples. “When will all this happen?” The answer was given in Daniel 12, but the understanding of that answer is sealed until the time of the end. At that time, the wise will understand the answer. But the wicked will not understand the answer. So the understanding about the unknown day and hour remains sealed until the time of the end. When we see the abomination, the wise (and only the wise) will understand because the resurrection will be 1290 days later, and the rapture will be 1335 days after the abomination. People use the “no one knows” verse to argue a pre-tribulation rapture. They make the verse refer to a rapture that’s not even in the chapter, instead of to the rapture just five verses prior. This is taking the verse out of context. Such flawed reasoning is the basis of the Doctrine of Imminence. Jesus did not say that no one would ever know the day or the hour. He simply said that no one knows the day or the hour. Understanding the verse from the background of Daniel 12 makes it clear. To insert that word ever into the interpretation changes the tense of the verb. Here is Young’s Literal Translation of the verse, which does a better job of showing the correct tense of the verb:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notice that Jesus says that not even the angels understand the answer to the question. In Daniel 12:5-6, it was an angel who originally asked the big mystery question. Perhaps the angel understood the answer, but was asking the question for Daniel’s benefit. But apparently Jesus interpreted it to mean that not even the angel who asked the mystery question understands this mystery answer. The wise should watch the signs in order that we will know. The wicked will not know the day or the hour. But the wise will understand the answer to the question. If we are to be removed before these signs happen, then why did Jesus ask us to watch for these signs in the first place? What about knowing the hour? Most likely Jesus was not speaking about a 60-minute hour. The terms “day and hour,” in English, are usually seen as the specific hour of a specific day. But the point Jesus is making is that no one, at that time, knew the answer to the question. Not even Christ, at that time, knew when He would return. (He probably does know now.) The Greek word for “hour” often means a time, not the hour of a specific day. For example, in John 2:4, Jesus said “My hour [to do miracles and ministry] has not yet come” (ESV). It’s the same Greek word. Jesus was saying the time for the three or four years (3 ½) of his ministry had not yet come. The NIV translates the same verse as “My time has not yet come.” Likewise, Matthew 24:36 could be translated as, “And concerning that day and time no one hath known.” The seven-year period prior to Christ’s appearing in the clouds can be considered as the “time” of Christ’s return. It fits the context because in verses 15-29 Jesus speaks of the time of great tribulation. It’s this entire time-period, of which he has spoken, that is in answer to the disciples’ question. It’s this entire time-period of the great tribulation that no one hath known when will come. The unknown day is the day Christ will appear in the clouds. The unknown hour is the time-period which precedes that day. When we see the time of the great tribulation, we will also know the day Christ will return. It will be 1290 days after the “abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel.” “No one knows the day or the hour.” According to Strong’s Concordance, the Greek word for “knows” (eido) is “used only in certain past tenses.” The word can also be translated as “understand.” As shown earlier, Young translates it as “No one hath known.” This Greek word cannot place restrictions on whether or not one will know in the future. Here are some other places in the gospels where the same Greek word is used in the negative to say that someone does not know something: Matt. 20:22, 22:29, 26:70, 26:72, 26:74, Mark 4:13, 9:6, 10:38, 12:24, 14:68, 14:71, Luke 9:55, 23:34, John 1:26, 2:9, 4:22, 4:32, 7:28, 9:12, 9:21, 9:25, 9:29, 9:30, 10:5, 12:35, 13:7, 14:5, 15:15, 19:10, 20:2, 20:9, 20:13, 20:14, 21:4. None of these verses imply that they would never know. In many cases, later they did know. For example, in Mark 4:13, we read, “And he said unto them, Know ye not this parable?” Did Jesus mean that the disciples would never understand the parable? Today we don’t know (understand) the exact day when the rapture will happen. But when we see the abomination of desolation, we will know. We will understand the answer to the big mystery question. The Doctrine of Imminence is a false doctrine. | (KJV Daniel 12:5-6) Then I Daniel
looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and
the other on that side of the bank of the river. [6] And one said to the man clothed in
linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these
wonders?
(KJV Daniel 12:8-10) And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? [9] And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. [10] Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. (KJV Matthew 24:36) But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Doctrine of Imminence states Christ could return at any moment. J. Dwight Pentecost is one of the most famous dispensationalist theologians. Since 1965, he served 35 years on the faculty of Dallas Theological Seminary. In his book “Things To Come”, (over 215,000 copies sold without a revision), copyright 1958, Ch. XIII, Sect. 2-I, page 202, on “The doctrine of imminence,” Pentecost writes:
Let’s think about what Dr. Pentecost is saying. We are taught, “No one knows the day or the hour.” So the rapture can happen at any moment. If the rapture were post-tribulation, so the reasoning goes, then we could compute 1290 (or 1335) days from the abomination (Daniel 12:11-12). Therefore, the rapture must be pre-tribulation. Because the rapture is pre-tribulation, Dr. Pentecost reasons, the signs are not for the Church, but for Israel. Yet, according to Dr. Pentecost, not even Israel can know the day or the hour. “No one knows.” And these signs are given for Israel. So I guess he thinks the tribulation saints are going to be too stupid to do the calculation once they see the abomination. Ok, so perhaps Dr. Pentecost misstated the pre-tribulation rapture position. Perhaps the pre-tribulation rapture position holds the words, “No one knows,” to be addressing only the “secret” coming (Parousia) and not the coming (Parousia) as given in Matthew 24:27-31. Let’s think about the idea that the pre-tribulation rapture is imminent, and this is thus a doctrine of Scripture. Dr. Pentecost goes on about the doctrine of imminence:
So, Dr. Pentecost believes this doctrine goes all the way back to the New Testament. I guess Dr. Pentecost did not fully think about the ramifications of 2 Thessalonians 2.
The man of sin must be revealed before the rapture. Is this not a sign that must precede the rapture? If so, the doctrine of imminence would be false. “No,” the pre-tribulation rapture advocates will claim. “The Holy Spirit is the restrainer, and when the Holy Spirit is removed in the rapture, the man of sin will be revealed at the same time.” OK, so how is the man of sin revealed? “Well,” say the pre-tribulation rapture advocates, “The man of sin is revealed when he signs a covenant with Israel” (Daniel 9:27). OK, how could there have been a covenant with the nation of Israel, before it came into existence in 1948? Would not the appearance of Israel in 1948 be a sign that had to come before the rapture could take place? If so, would that not disprove the doctrine of imminence? Was the doctrine of imminence true only true after 1948? Yet Dr. Pentecost says the doctrine of imminence goes all the way back to the writers of the New Testament. “But, but, but,” the pre-tribulation advocate might counter, “Israel existed at the time of the New Testament writers.” OK, so perhaps the doctrine of imminence became false in 70 AD, but became true again in 1948. Yet Dr. Pentecost says the doctrine was not new with Darby. So it must have been true at the time of Darby and before. Darby wrote in 1830, long before Israel became a nation. Dr. Pentecost also says the doctrine of imminence existed at the time of the early church fathers. All the writings of the early church that we have were written after 70 AD. Bottom line is the doctrine of imminence is a false doctrine. The New Testament writers were hopeful of the (Parousia) coming of Christ. But they understood that the great tribulation must come first. As we have seen, the existence of Israel as a nation has been a sign that had to precede the rapture, disproving the doctrine of imminence. Another event that had to precede the rapture was the death of Peter. In John 21:18-19, Jesus told the disciples how Peter would die at an old age. Perhaps the disciples didn’t think about it. But the rapture could not have happened before Peter’s death. Otherwise, Peter would not have died as Christ had foretold. It may surprise the pre-tribulation rapture advocate to learn that Paul actually taught against the doctrine of imminence. To see this, look at 2 Thessalonians 2:1 3. The letter or rumor Paul was dealing with alleged that the day of the Lord had already come (verse 2). It concerned the coming of the Lord, and our being gathered unto him (verse 1). If the day of the Lord were understood by the Jews as a single 24 hour day, it would have come and gone long before a rumor or letter could get around. We must interpret Scripture the way ancient Jews would have understood. The day of the Lord is the Messianic Age to come. Paul couldn’t say, “Hey look, we have not yet been caught up in the rapture!” That’s because the day of the Lord was not a 24 hour day. Also, if the day of the Lord is defined as being a time period beginning at the start of the tribulation, at the time of the rapture, then Paul could have also said, “Hey look, we have not yet been caught up in the rapture!” So, in order to dispel the rumor or letter, Paul had to give a sign that must occur before the age to come, and our being gathered unto Him. He was preaching against the doctrine of imminence. In other words, certain signs and events do have to occur before Christ will return. It can’t happen at any moment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We are continuing to examine Matthew 24 with the background of the Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12. In Matthew 24:42-51, we read about the thief-in-the-night parable. This is the original source of the thief-in-the-night symbolism. The word "watch" (KJV), in this verse, indicates that the thief comes at night. Other translations, such as the NIV, actually use the word ‘night.’ This doesn't necessarily mean that Christ will come during nighttime hours. (More about that later.) The parable is about a servant who is either wise or wicked. And the issue, according to verse 42, is not knowing what day the Lord will come. If the servant is wise, he will know the day. If the servant is wicked he will not know the day (verse 50). So those who are wise will know the day. They will watch the signs and know the day from the signs. Those who are wicked will not know the day. The concept of the wise, who will understand, and the wicked, who will not understand comes from the original Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12. The wicked will not understand the answer to the question in Daniel 12. They will not know the answer to the question, “How long will it be before these astonishing things are fulfilled?” (Daniel 12:6). They will not know the day or the time (hour). But the wise will observe the abomination of desolation and will know the day of Christ's return. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates use the thief in the night symbolism to say that the rapture will be “secret”, and can happen at any moment. But most pre-tribulation rapture advocates seem to be unaware of where this symbolism originates. They are simply assuming it’s meaning simply by the fact that a thief comes when you don’t expect him to come. However, it’s only the wicked that will be surprised. The thief comes to steal. What is the Son of Man coming to steal? He is coming to take away his Bride. The house is the world, owned by the Master but controlled by Satan. Christ is coming into the house ruled by Satan to steal His Bride from Satan’s kingdom. The world will not know the day or the hour. But the Bride will know, because the Bride watches the signs of His return. Read verse 50 closely. Is it the good servant or the wicked servant who will not know the day when Christ returns? It’s the wicked servant that will not know the day or the hour. But the Bride will know. Right now, no one knows the day or hour. But after enough of the signs have been given, the Bride will know. The closer we get to that day, the better we will know (verses 32-33). But the wicked will remain in darkness. | (KJV Matthew 24:42-51) Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. [43] But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch [hour of the night] the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up. [44] Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh. [45] Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season? [46] Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing. [47] Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods. [48] But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; [49] And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken; [50] The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, [51] And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The thief in the night symbolism continues: In 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, Paul describes the rapture in the same way Jesus did in Matthew 24:29-31. Then, in 1 Thessalonians 5:2-4, Paul refers to the thief in the night. In so doing, Paul is making reference to the parable given to us by Jesus. Paul also makes it clear that it's the world that does not know when Christ will return. But the Bride is not in this darkness (verse 5:4). In verse 5:1, Paul says that he does not need to tell us the times and the seasons (which is to say, the day and the time (hour).) Why? In verse 4 he tells us why. The Bride is not in this darkness. The Bride will be able to understand the signs. So the Bride will know the day and time (hour). Another use of the thief in the night symbolism is 2 Peter 3:10. Peter associates this symbol with the day of the Lord, as does Paul in 1 Thessalonians 5:2. The day of the Lord is not the day of Satan. It’s the day when the antichrist is defeated. The next use of the thief in the night symbolism is Revelation 3:3. Jesus says that it’s those who do not wake-up (NIV) or watch (KJV) who will not know the hour of his return. Jesus is telling the people at this Gentile church at Sardis to repent or they will not know the time (hour) of His return. Those who watch the signs, and make themselves ready, will know the time (hour). The world, however, will not know the time (hour) of Christ’s return. This is not to say that these Christians at Sardis will not be saved if they do not watch. It’s saying they will be like the wicked, who do will not know. If they do not watch (or wake up) they will be saved. But they will not inherit the kingdom. Let’s read this verse carefully:
Pre-tribulation rapture advocates will quickly say that “no man knows the day or hour.” By this they mean that no man will know the day or hour right up to the time of the rapture. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Since pre-tribulation rapture advocates believe that no man will know the day or the hour, they would include themselves. Yet this verse makes it clear that not knowing the day or hour is a bad consequence for a lack of repentance. All of the previous uses of the thief-in-the-night symbol are future tense. “If … thou shall not watch … thou shall not know.” (KJV) But the final use of this symbol is in the present tense. In Revelation 16:15 Jesus says, “Behold, I come as a thief.” That’s when it happens. This is after the sixth bowl of wrath (Revelation 16:12-14), and before Armageddon (Revelation 16:16). So the rapture is after the great tribulation, just as Jesus taught us in Matthew 24:29-31. Because of this verse, some pre-tribulation rapture advocates say the thief in the night comes to kill and destroy. Some do not associate the thief in the night with the unknown day and hour. However, such a view does not hold up when all the verses are re-examined. Revelation 3:3, quoted above, directly associates the coming of Christ as a thief with His coming at an unknown hour. Also, the original thief-in-the-night parable, in Matthew 24:43-44 directly equates the timing of the thief with the unknown day and hour. The only possible conclusion is for the thief to be associated with the unknown day and hour, and for the unknown day an hour to be after the six bowls of wrath. Let’s go back and think about Daniel 12 again. This parable was derived from the background of Daniel 12. In Daniel 12, what is the night? The word “night” is not found in Daniel 12. However, Daniel 12:3 speaks of the time right after the resurrection. It says, “Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever” (Daniel 12:3). Does this time of righteousness not sound like day? Think back to the words of Paul. “But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief" (2 Thessalonians 5:4). A time of darkness is a time of unrighteousness. It’s a time of night. So, the time before the resurrection is the night. At the time of the resurrection, Jesus will come to steal his Bride away from the night. From the abomination, there are 1290 days to the resurrection. And there are 1335 days to the rapture. This time of great tribulation is the night. Jesus comes as a thief in the night to steel his Bride. It’s not before the night. It’s in the night. | (KJV 1 Thessalonians 5:1-4) But of the
times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. [2] For yourselves know perfectly
that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. [3] For when they shall say, Peace and
safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they
shall not escape. [4] But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you
as a thief.
(KJV Revelation 3:3) Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee. (KJV Revelation 16:15-16) Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jesus said, "As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world” (John 9:4-5). And now that Jesus is no longer in the world, we are the light of the world. But night is coming when no more work can be done. Night is the great tribulation. During that time the saints will be handed over to the man of lawlessness (Daniel 7:25). So no more work can be done. During that time, the beast will be given power to make war against the saints, and to conquer them. So no more work can be done. He will rule 42 months over every nation, tribe, people and language (Revelation 13:5-7). This is the night, when no work can be done. But at the end of the 1290 days, Jesus will return as a thief in the night. | (KJV John 9:4-5) I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During the tribulation, the “man of lawlessness” will rule over every nation, tribe, people, and language (Revelation 13:5-7). But Paul tells us the “man of lawlessness” will not be revealed until the Restrainer is taken out of the way (2 Thessalonians 2:5-7). Pre-tribulation rapture advocates have argued that the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit. This argues against the rapture being “immediately after the tribulation.” But if the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit, there is a problem with verses 1-3 of this same chapter (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3). These verses tell us that the “man of lawlessness” must be revealed before we are gathered. But verses 5-7 would argue that we must be gathered before the “man of lawless” is revealed. So which is it? The idea of the restrainer being the Holy Spirit is so ingrained into most pre-tribulation advocates that I saw a video where one well-know pre-tribulation rapture advocate quoted 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7, using the words “Holy Spirit” instead of simply, “the one who now holds it back.” But Paul does not give us the identity of the restrainer. Verses 5 and 6, however, indicate the people at Thessalonica would have known his identity. Was this a new revelation that Paul gave the people at Thessalonica, yet did not record in his letters? Or was Paul simply making reference to an Old Testament teaching? Daniel 10:12-14, 10:20-21, 11:1-2 teaches us that Michael protects the rulers of the world from the forces of Satan. The angel speaks of Michael, saying that Michael is the only other power who helps him fight the prince of Persia. This vision was given two years after the Medes and the Persians conquered Babylon. The statue of Daniel 2 shows us these changes in world rule. The statue starts with Babylon. Then on the statue we see the Medes and Persians. Next, we have Greece. When Darius the Mede took power, Michael and this angel took a stand to protect him. As each of the world rulers takes power, Michael and this angel take a stand to protect the rulers. The stand is against the powers of darkness, such as "the prince of Persia." These battles are in the spiritual realm. This is why Paul says the “mystery” or “secret” power of the iniquity, which the restrainer restrains, is already at work (2 Thessalonians 2:7). God appoints these rulers, whom Michael is protecting (Romans 13:1-7). We are told to obey them. Michael's purpose is to protect the rulers of the world so that Satan does not completely overtake them. In so doing, Michael is protecting us. However, when Christ returns, God's people will rule (Revelation 2:26). So, when the time comes, Michael will naturally take a stand to protect the new rulers. He will protect us instead of the world rulers. Daniel 12:1 tells us that Michael will take this stand just before the great tribulation. When Michael takes a stand, Satan is free to completely overtake the antichrist. So today, Michael restrains the antichrist. When he "takes a stand" the "man of lawlessness" will be revealed or exposed. There is no Scriptural support for the Restrainer being the Holy Spirit. The Restrainer is Michael. The Church does not have to be removed before the antichrist is revealed. And Matthew 24:29-31 tells us that the rapture is “immediately after the tribulation.” | (KJV 2 Thessalonians 2:1-6) Now we beseech
you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto
him, [2] That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by
word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. [3] Let no man deceive you by
any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling
away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; [4] Who opposeth
and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth
in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. [5] Remember ye not, that, when I was yet
with you, I told you these things? [6] And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed
in his time.
(KJV Daniel 10:12-14) Then said he unto me, Fear not, Daniel: for from the first day that thou didst set thine heart to understand, and to chasten thyself before thy God, thy words were heard, and I am come for thy words. [13] But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia. [14] Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days. (KJV Daniel 10:20-21) Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come. [21] But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both Peter and Paul associate the thief-in-the-night return of Christ with the “day of the Lord” (2 Peter 3:10, 1 Thessalonians 5:2, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2). The day of the Lord is not the day of the antichrist. It’s the day when the antichrist is defeated. But what is the day of the Lord? Is it a single 24-hour day? Or is it a period of time, or an age? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Let’s first take a look at what the Old Testament prophets said about the day of the Lord. Sometimes, the day of the Lord was simply a time of judgment on a nation. This can be seen in Ezekiel 13:5 and 30:3. In Ezekiel 13, God tells Ezekiel to prophecy against the prophets of Israel. These false prophets were saying “peace” when there is no peace (verse 10). They built a flimsy wall thinking it would give them safety (verses 10-12). But there is no safety. No doubt this is where Paul gets 1 Thessalonians 5:1-3, saying the day of the Lord comes as a thief in the night. While people are saying “peace and safety,” sudden destruction comes upon them. Ezekiel 13 is no doubt talking about the time before Israel was scattered to Babylon. Yet Paul apparently sees a connection between this day of the Lord and the end-times day of the Lord when Christ returns as a thief in the night. The day of the Lord in Ezekiel 13 becomes a type for the end-times day of the Lord. Ezekiel 30 also speaks of the day of the Lord. In this chapter the Lord said, “I will put an end to the hordes of Egypt by the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon” (verse 10). So again, the day of the Lord can be about the judgment of a nation. It was to be a time when the idols of Egypt were destroyed. So again, this day of the Lord is a type for the end-times day of the Lord when all the worldly idols of money and possessions will be destroyed. There are other Old Testament passages that speak more directly about the end-times day of the Lord. Isaiah 13:6-13 speaks of the time of God’s wrath. It’s a time where there are signs in the heavens. The stars in the heavens don’t give their light. The sun is darkened, and the moon doesn’t give its light. | (KJV Ezekiel 13:5) Ye have not gone up into the
gaps, neither made up the hedge for the house of Israel to stand in the battle in the day of the LORD.
(KJV Ezekiel 13:10-12) Because, even because they have seduced my people, saying, Peace; and there was no peace; and one built up a wall, and, lo, others daubed it with untempered mortar: [11] Say unto them which daub it with untempered mortar, that it shall fall: there shall be an overflowing shower; and ye, O great hailstones, shall fall; and a stormy wind shall rend it. [12] Lo, when the wall is fallen, shall it not be said unto you, Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joel chapters 1-3 are about the end-times day of the Lord. Joel 2:30-31 speaks about the signs in the heavens and the earth. The sun is turned to darkness, and the moon to blood. But Joel 2:31 says these signs come before the day of the Lord. So apparently these signs announce the coming of that day. Reading on into Joel 3, we see the gathering of the nations for Armageddon. This will take longer than one day. So the day of the Lord is not one single 24-hour day. Zechariah 14:1 says the day of the Lord is when the plunder of the nations is divided among the people of Israel. The chapter goes on to show how the day of the Lord starts out with the attack of the nations upon Jerusalem. Then Christ returns with his feet on the Mount of Olives. After that, year after year, the “survivors from all the nations that have attacked Jerusalem will go up year after year to worship the King, the LORD Almighty” (verse 16). All this takes more than one 24-hour day. Based on the principle of a day being a thousand years, the day of the Lord would be the thousand-year reign of Christ. Or if one does not believe in that principle, the day of the Lord would at least be the Messianic age to come. The day of the Lord comes as a thief in the night. Therefore, pre-tribulation rapture advocates must insist that the day of the Lord be a thousand years, plus the seven years of the tribulation. Or they say it’s just the seven years. But there is no Scripture support of this. A day is not seven years. A day is not a thousand plus seven years. The Messianic age to come cannot include the time when the antichrist rules. But a day can be a thousand years. The day of the Lord is not the day of the antichrist. It’s the day when the antichrist is defeated. Also, we must remember that according to Malachi 4:5, Elijah comes before the day of the Lord. So unless the pre-tribulation rapture advocates say the coming of Elijah is a sign that must take place before the rapture, we must rule out the idea that the day of the Lord covers the seven-year tribulation. We know the resurrection is on the “last day” (John 6:39,40,44,54, 11:24, 12:48). Some believe the “last day” is the last of seven millennial days. The Old Testament passages on the day of the Lord do indicate an age. But I don’t believe the context of these verses in John, about the “last day” supports the idea of an age. Reading a thousand years into these verses in John seems to be forcing it to say something that’s not from just a natural reading. So I believe the “last day” is simply the last day before the millennium. It’s the last day before the Messianic age to come. Earlier, from our study of Daniel 12, we learned that the resurrection occurs 1290 days after the abomination. Then the rapture is 45 days after that. The resurrection is the “last day” before the millennium. 1290 days after the abomination is the “last day” before the millennium. Revelation 20:4 says they come to life and reign with Christ for a thousand years. This also supports the fact that the resurrection is on the “last day”, right before the millennium. The thousand-year reign begins on the day right after the resurrection. It’s the “last day” of the reign of Satan. It’s the last day of the Night. Then the rapture happens 45 days after that. The rapture is on the 45th day of the millennium. Recall that in Joel 3, we see the gathering of the nations for Armageddon. This is after the start of the day of the Lord, which was in Joel 2:31. In Revelation 16:15-16, we see that the kings are gathered for Armageddon after the rapture. So Armageddon is very soon after the 45th day of the millennium. And the first six bowls of wrath occur during those 45 days. In other words, the seven bowls of wrath are all at the start of the great day of the wrath of the Lamb (Revelation 6:16-17). Also, recall all the Old Testament prophets that say the day of the Lord is the day of wrath. God’s major pouring out of wrath does not begin until the start of the millennium. Looking again at Revelation 16, there are six major bowls of wrath before the rapture. Then there is the seventh bowl, which is devastating. The first six bowls, it seems, are poured out during the first 45 days of the millennium. That’s about one bowl every week. After the six weeks of bowls, the kings are gathered for Armageddon. Then the armies of the nations are destroyed in the seventh bowl. For reasons beyond the scope of this article, I believe the trumpet-plagues are before the abomination. (See the article “Old Testament Symbolism in Revelation” for more information.) This means that the 1290 days from the abomination are relatively quiet as far as the wrath of God is concerned. Of course there will be a lot of percussion of Christians during that time. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates have tried to claim that the days of Noah are pre-tribulation because, “people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage.” But as we can see, the 1290 days will be days that seem quite peaceful. Sure, there will be a lot of persecution of the Christians. It’s a time of great tribulation for those who profess Christ as Savior. It’s not a time of tribulation for the world. To the world it will seem peaceful. There will not be wars because it will be a one-world government. People will be saying “peace and safety.” Then, when the day of the Lord arrives, sudden destruction will come upon them. The sudden destruction is seven terrifying weeks as God pours out his bowls of wrath. And, of course, the seventh week is Armageddon.
| (KJV Joel 2:30-31) And I will show wonders in
the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke. [31] The sun shall be turned
into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.
(KJV Joel 3:1-2) For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, [2] I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. (KJV Joel 3:9-18) Proclaim ye this among the Gentiles; Prepare war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near; let them come up: [10] Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears: let the weak say, I am strong. [11] Assemble yourselves, and come, all ye heathen, and gather yourselves together round about: thither cause thy mighty ones to come down, O LORD. [12] Let the heathen be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about. [13] Put ye in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe: come, get you down; for the press is full, the vats overflow; for their wickedness is great. [14] Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision. [15] The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining. [16] The LORD also shall roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake: but the LORD will be the hope of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel. [17] So shall ye know that I am the LORD your God dwelling in Zion, my holy mountain: then shall Jerusalem be holy, and there shall no strangers pass through her any more.[18] And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of Shittim. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One final proof-text against the days of Noah being pre-tribulation is found in Luke 17:22-27. In verse 24, the day of the Son of Man is said to be like lightening, which flashes and lights up the sky from one end to the other. Obviously this is the same as the post-tribulation coming (Parousia) in Matthew 24:27, with lightening that comes from the east and is visible in the west. Luke 27 continues with verses 26 and 27. After the days of Noah comes the day when Noah enters the ark. The day when Noah enters the ark is being compared with the day of the Son of Man. The day of the Son of Man, therefore, is post-tribulation. The day of the Son of Man is the same as the day of the Lord. It’s post-tribulation. The pre-tribulation rapture theory requires the day of the Lord to extend back to the start of the tribulation. This is because the day of the Lord comes as a thief-in-the-night (1 Thessalonians 5:2). But this single verse, Luke 27:24, equates the day of the Lord with the post-tribulation coming of Christ. This one verse alone should establish major doubt in anyone’s mind about the pre-tribulation rapture. And Luke 27:30 says this day is the day the Son of Man is revealed. It’s not a “secret” rapture. | (KJV Luke 17:24-27) For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day. [25] But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation. [26] And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. [27] They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In 1 Thessalonians 5:9, Paul says that we are not appointed to God’s wrath. This has been a favorite verse that’s been used by pre-tribulation rapture advocates. The argument is that the rapture must be before the tribulation, because we are not appointed to God’s wrath. But actually, this is another verse that proves the rapture is after the tribulation. No one argues the fact the there are Christians during the tribulation. Pre-tribulation rapture advocates call them “tribulation saints.” But are these saints appointed to God’s wrath? No, they are not. We are not appointed to God’s wrath, and neither are they. The rapture is for them as well. So we must read the verse in context. Paul is speaking of the time when the world is saying “peace and safety.” Then sudden destruction comes on the world. The world experiences a false “peace and safety” during the 42 months when the antichrist rules over every nation, tribe, people, and language (Revelation 13:5-7). As we have seen, there will be no trumpet-plagues or bowls of wrath during the 1290 days. At the end of those days, Christ returns as a thief-in-the-night, and there is sudden destruction for the world. No one who has Christ is appointed to this wrath. But are we appointed to the other plagues and wrath given in Revelation? Are the “tribulation saints” appointed to these plagues? The plagues and wrath given in Revelation have strong parallels to the plagues given to Egypt: water is turned into blood; there are frogs, boils on the skin, hail, locusts, and darkness. So for any wrath of God that happens prior to the rapture, God will protect us in the same way He protected Israel during the plagues on Egypt. God is able and powerful enough to protect us in the midst of his plagues and wrath on the world | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We are continuing to examine Matthew 24 with the background of the Olivet Discourse in Daniel 12. In Matthew 25:1-13, we read about the parable of the ten virgins. Five are wise, and five are foolish. All ten are waiting on the Lord's return. All ten are Christian. But only five are able to enter into the wedding banquet. Remember that Jesus is continuing to draw from Daniel 12, where only the wise will know the answer to the question. Only the wise will know the day and the hour of the resurrection, and of Christ’s return. Jesus concludes by saying, "I tell you the truth, I don't know you. Therefore, keep watch because you don't know the day or the hour." So again, the issue of the unknown day and hour originates in Daniel 12 and is continued in this parable. In Daniel 12, the wise will know the answer to the question. The wicked will not know the day of the resurrection. Five of the virgins are wise and will know the day and hour. Five are foolish and will not know the day and hour. The foolish are not wicked. They are between wise and wicked. They are saved, but they do not inherit the kingdom. This goes back to the New Wine System, as taught in my book titled, New Wine for the End Times. The only difference between the wise virgins and the foolish virgins is the amount of oil they have. All ten virgins are asleep. All then virgins await the bridegroom, so all ten have faith in Christ. We can assume that all ten believe that Christ was raised from the dead. There is nothing we can do to add to what Christ did on the cross. Therefore, all ten are saved. All ten virgins have some oil, but the foolish virgins do not have enough. The amount of oil is the only difference between the wise and the foolish virgins. Yet this difference seems to prevent them from getting in into the wedding banquet. They are saved, but they do not inherit the kingdom. What is the oil? If oil is faith in Christ, then we must ask how much faith is needed to be saved. Scripture does not teach that a certain level of faith is required for salvation. Works are not required for salvation. If you assume the foolish virgins are not saved, then the lack of oil could not be a lack of works. A lack of works does not prevent us from being saved. All ten have some oil. If the oil is works, then how much works are required for salvation? On the other hand, if we understand that salvation does not necessarily mean inheriting the kingdom, then the parable makes sense. The New Wine System uniquely explains this parable. The New Wine System distinguishes salvation from inheriting the kingdom. In the New Wine System, salvation is a free gift. But inheriting the kingdom requires lots of works. The oil is works. Right now, we are the light of the world. But Night is coming when no more work can be done (John 9:4-5). As we shine our light, the Holy Spirit gives us more oil. You get oil in your lamps by doing the work that our Father in heaven would have you do. The foolish virgins do not have enough works to get into the wedding banquet. Yet they are still saved. The wise will know the time of the Lord’s return, so they will be ready when the Bridegroom arrives. They will have oil in their lamps, because they overcome sin by doing the Father’s works. The foolish will not be ready. They are more self-centered, fearful of the great tribulation. They adopt the pre-tribulation rapture doctrine because it’s not in their nature to help others, doing the works of the Father, no matter the cost. Sure, they want to help others. But if it comes to choice between skipping over the tribulation, and trying to keep others from taking the mark of the beast, pre-tribulation rapture advocates pick skipping over the tribulation. As we do the works of the Father, the Holy Spirit fills us. We do the works of the Father through the power of the Holy Spirit. This is how Christ gets to know us. Those who believe in Christ, but don’t do his works, are those who believe they know Christ, but Christ does not know them. Christ tells the foolish virgins, “I never knew you.” Only the wise virgins will know the day or the hour. The foolish virgins will not know. That's not to say that pre-tribulation advocates go to hell. The foolish virgins will not go to hell. But they don’t inherit the kingdom either. Jesus is drawing a correlation between those who "watch," in order to know the day and hour, and those who get into the wedding banquet to inherit the kingdom. Those who watch for "all these things" (Matthew 24:33), do so with full expectation of going through the tribulation. "All these things" includes the abomination of desolation and the tribulation. This expectation of going through the tribulation brings holiness. Working to help bring in the kingdom also brings holiness. Working to stop others from taking the mark of the beast produces holiness. Post-tribulation advocates become spiritually prepared to die for the Lord. They know the true meaning of "take up your cross and follow me." Their heart is not set on skipping over the tribulation. Their heart is set on continuing to do the works of the Father until no more work can be done. | (KJV Matthew 25:1-13) Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. [2] And five of them were wise, and five were foolish. [3] They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them: [4] But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps. [5] While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept. [6] And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him. [7] Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps. [8] And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out. [9] But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves. [10] And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut. [11] Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us. [12] But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not. [13] Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Philip B. Brown
|
Overcome sin, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!
